I read Kat Dunn's Hungerstone because I had to. I'd exhausted all the other books in my library stack, and half of them were overdue, too. Those I read without joy, as a way to distract myself through a family health crisis. It barely worked. Everything I read for a month left me listless. So when I picked up Hungerstone, I expected more of the same. I was mistaken! I loved this book. It was exactly what I needed to pull me firmly out of reality and into the mad world of Nethershaw. It was violent without being gory, emotional without tripping any of my sensitive wires. And the voice was excellent. By the middle of this book I was debating whether I should give first person a try too on my next novel. While reading circumstances weren't great, I really enjoyed this book and will read more of this author.
Last week I finished revising the final scene of Beekeeper. Yay! Only, we're never really done, are we? Over the course of this round of revision, I had pulled together a short list of scene snippets that I wanted to shoe-horn into the narrative and quality checks that I'd stumbled over during the weeks of drafting. After a bit of heel-kicking and whining (I just spent 44 days heads-down revising my novel! I was tired!) I got to it. The two quality checks were: Assess that each chapter has a unique goal. A friend in my writing group suggested this as a way to ensure that the pacing is moving along and that the character agency is clear. Make sure each event can be linked by the words "therefore" or "but." If I remember correctly, this exercise was suggested through Writing Excuses (but don't ask me which episode). If two events can be linked by the words "and" or "then," there isn't enough causality to string the novel toget...